NewsAbout AABGovernanceContact
AI Assessment Board (AAB)Advancing AI literacy through evidence and standardsSearch registry
Back to Pilots
pilot recordPublished
AAB-PILOT-2025-LL-001

Yorba Linda Public Library AI Storytime

One-time 90-minute public-library AI storytelling workshop in Yorba Linda, Southern California, using a generative AI storytelling application with elementary-age learners.

CompletedReviewedPublished
Pilot type description
Small group (5-15 learners), short duration, structured lesson plan, educator reflection.
Duration
One-time workshop; 90 minutes
Learner count
Not assigned in source case
Delivery model
Volunteer-facilitated workshop using shared devices
Technology environment
Generative AI storytelling application with shared devices; printed prompts and text input used when voice input was affected by background noise.
Privacy/data use
No individual logins, no personal data collection, no student names recorded, and no recordings or images stored.
Evidence base
Practitioner observation, activity documentation, qualitative engagement signals, and facilitator reflection.
Registry decision
Final summary and registry decision completed; published as a case-derived pilot note.
Category
Pilot Registry

Pilot process phases

Five-phase AAB pilot tracking view for this record.

Current phaseFinal summary and registry decisionCompleted
  1. 1

    Internal review

    Completed

    Confirm pilot scope, evidence basis, feasibility, and suitability for structured AAB pilot review.

  2. 2

    Preparation and alignment check

    Completed

    Map the activity to instructional goals, logistics, privacy constraints, and pilot objectives.

  3. 3

    Training and readiness

    Completed

    Confirm facilitator preparation, role boundaries, documentation methods, and safeguarding expectations.

  4. 4

    Implementation and monitoring

    Completed

    Document delivery, observations, issues, adaptations, and monitoring signals from the pilot activity.

  5. 5

    Final summary and registry decision

    Completed

    Synthesize context, design, implementation evidence, limitations, and registry disposition for human review.

Pilot framework note

AAB Pilot Framework case-derived pilot note

Framework
AAB Pilot Framework Version 1.0 Combined
Source case
AAB-CASE-2025-LL-001

Scope

The pilot documents a short informal-learning implementation in a public library. Graduate CS facilitators supported elementary-age learners in co-creating stories with a generative AI storytelling application.

Implementation summary

The activity used shared devices, no individual logins, no personal data collection, and volunteer facilitation. Learners selected familiar characters, supplied or selected prompts, reviewed generated story segments, and discussed human versus AI contributions.

Evidence summary

Evidence is descriptive and practitioner-reported. The record includes facilitator observations, activity documentation, qualitative engagement signals, observed prompt and voice-input challenges, and adaptations such as printed prompts and human editing pauses.

Framework alignment

The case supports Phase 4 implementation documentation and Phase 5 final-summary closure. Privacy and safeguarding constraints are low-risk because no student names, recordings, or personal accounts were collected.

Limitations

The activity was a one-time workshop with no controlled comparison, no retained student artifacts, and no formal pre/post assessment. Findings should be treated as implementation evidence rather than measured learning impact.

Reviewer note

Final registry disposition is completed as a published case-derived pilot note. Future review should only advance this record if additional formal pilot artifacts or outcome evidence are added.

Registry decision note

Phase 5 is marked completed because the published case record contains enough descriptive implementation evidence to close the pilot note as case-derived, while preserving its limitations.

Framework basis

  • AAB Pilot Framework Version 1.0 Combined defines a five-phase lifecycle: Internal Review; Preparation and Alignment; Training and Readiness; Implementation and Monitoring; Final Summary and Registry Decision.
  • The framework requires phase artifacts and advancement, readiness, monitoring, and registry decision notes before a pilot is treated as formally closed.
  • These records are case-derived pilot notes. They summarize completed implementation evidence and leave final registry decision language for human review.

AAB use case

Case-derived pilot record prepared under AAB Pilot Framework Version 1.0 summary logic.

pilotpublic libraryelementarygenerative AIstorytellinglow riskType A - Micro PilotMicro PilotCompletedReviewedPublished