Evidence submissions
Share cases, pilot notes, public reports, frameworks, assessments, resources, policies, or corrections for source-traced registry review.
Contact AAB
Contact the AI Assessment Board
Contact AAB about evidence submissions, standards review, research collaboration, pilot partnerships, corrections, and public-interest AI literacy work.
Emailinfo@aaboard.org
Use email for submissions, corrections, collaboration inquiries, and review requests.
Send emailWhat to include
Standards and consensus review
Contact AAB about draft standards, framework crosswalks, expert review, consensus reports, and public comment workflows.
Institutional and government collaboration
Discuss pilot partnerships, public-interest evidence infrastructure, implementation sites, research translation, or policy-facing briefings.
Research and volunteer participation
Ask about evidence screening, source trace support, literature review, data quality checks, and community review roles.
Submission guidance
- Include public source links, document titles, dates, organizations, and contact context when available.
- For cases or pilots, describe the setting, learner audience, implementation period, evidence artifacts, and outcomes documented.
- For corrections, include the page URL or record title and the specific change requested.
- Do not send private learner records, confidential personnel information, or sensitive personal data through ordinary email.
Response and review
AAB reviews inquiries according to relevance, source trace, public-interest value, privacy considerations, and available review capacity. Registry listing is documentation of evidence and participation; it is not endorsement, certification, or accreditation.