Summary
AI literacy standards require a living evidence infrastructure rather than a static topic list. AAB connects cases, pilots, policy signals, frameworks, assessments, resources, and community signals so standards claims can be reviewed against documented evidence.
Key evidence signals
- AAB evidence claims should preserve source trace through collection IDs and public records.
- AI literacy should be separated by age band, role, and use context rather than reduced to one all-ages competency statement.
- Registry records are evidence infrastructure, not endorsements of every listed tool, program, or provider.
Recommendations
- Use collection IDs in every public evidence claim.
- Maintain recurring evidence refreshes before major releases or standards revisions.
- Distinguish activity evidence, learning evidence, implementation quality evidence, and standards-ready evidence.