Case ReportPublished systematic reviewOct. 30, 2025
AAB-CASE-2025-RV-041
Conceptualizing AI literacies for children and youth: A systematic review on the design of AI literacy educational programs
Technion; CAEAI 2025; 23 programs analyzed.
This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01
Implementation
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
02
Learning context
In-school (K–12)
03
AI role
Tutor
04
Outcome signal
Framework critique
Registry Facets
0
Education Level
- K-12
Subject Area
- AI literacy
Use Case Type
- Systematic review
Stakeholder Group
- Researchers
AI Capability Type
- Broad
Implementation Model
- Classroom-level
Evidence Type
- Systematic review
Outcomes Domain
- Framework critique
Implementing Organization
1
Organization Type
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Location
Haifa, Israel
Primary Facilitator Role
Authors
Learning Context
2
Setting Type
- In-school (K–12)
- Informal learning
Session Format
SLR of program design papers
Duration
Through 2023
Group Size
23 studies
Devices
Various program tools
Constraints
- Publication lag
- English bias possible
Learner Profile
3
Age Range
Children and youth
Prior AI Exposure Assumed
Varies
Prior Programming Background Assumed
Varies
Educational Intent
4
Primary Learning Goals
- Map motivations and frameworks
- Apply operational/sociocultural/critical lens
- Characterize theories/pedagogies
Secondary Learning Goals
- Argue for balanced critical+sociocultural integration
What This Was Not
- Not student outcome meta-analysis
AI Tool Description
5
Tool Type
Program types heterogeneous
AI Role
- Tutor
- Co-creator
Languages
Global literature
User Interaction Model
- Dominant operational skill focus in designs
Safeguards
- Programs should strengthen ethics/critical dimensions per review
Activity Design
6
Activity Flow
- Search
- screen 23
- framework synthesis
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
Scaffolding Strategies
Observed Challenges
7
Educators Reported
- Critical literacy underrepresented
- Operational dominates
- Framework proliferation
Design Adaptations
8
Adaptations
- Three-dimensional literacy lens applied to AI programs
Reported Outcomes
9
Engagement
Learning Signals
- Constructivism + PBL dominant pattern
Educators Reflection
Calls for stronger sociocultural/critical program balance.
Ethical & Privacy Considerations
10
Privacy
- Ethics in primary studies
- Equity of program access
Evidence Type
11
Evidence
- Activity documentation
- Practitioner observation
Relevance to Research
12
Potential Research Use
- Design programs with explicit critical modules
- Measure sociocultural outcomes
Relevant Research Domains
- AI literacy frameworks
- Systematic review
Case Status
13
Case Status
- Completed
AAB Classification Tags
14
Age
K-12 youth
Setting
Global
AI Function
Literacy programs
Pedagogy
Review
Risk Level
Low
Data Sensitivity
N/A
Registry Metadata
15
Case ID
AAB-CASE-2025-RV-041
Publication Status
Published systematic review
Tags
caseK-12Haifa, IsraelClassroom-levelBroadAI literacySystematic review