Afterschool Mini AI Summer Camp K-2
Afterschool summer camp (5 days) using a generative AI storytelling application plus AI concept slides with learners ages ~5–7 in Diamond Bar, Southern California. The activity emphasized creative storytelling and early AI awareness, with post-assessment included.
Implementation
Afterschool center
Learning context
Afterschool center
AI role
Co-creator
Outcome signal
Not specified
Implementing Organization
Afterschool center
Diamond Bar, Southern California, USA
Undergrad. and graduate CS students; technical educators
Learning Context
- Afterschool center
Summer camp
5 days
Around 6
Individual device
- No individual logins allowed No personal data collection Time-limited setup and teardown Poor Wi‑Fi signal
Learner Profile
Approx. ages 5–7
No prior experience with generative AI tools assumed
No prior programming background assumed
Educational Intent
- Narrative structure (beginning–middle–end) Creative expression
- Awareness of AI as a tool (not a human) Prompt clarity and iteration Reflection on human vs AI contributions
- Not a programming lesson Not an AI theory lesson
AI Tool Description
Generative AI storytelling application; AI concept slides
English
- Co-creator
- Students pick their favorite stuffed animals Educators take a picture of the animal Students provide or pick short prompts using text or voice AI generates story segments Students provide or pick more prompts using text or voice
- No free-form open chat Content moderation enabled
Activity Design
- Educators introduce storytelling concepts Group brainstorms story themes Students input prompts AI generates draft story text Final story is read aloud
- Human: theme selection, editing, discussion AI: draft generation, storyline suggestions
- Prompt cards with examples Sentence starters Educator-led reflection questions
Observed Challenges
- One student cannot read or speak English Some prompts were vague or contradictory Younger students needed help typing prompts One student felt not learned, so he was later added to the age 8-10 group.
Design Adaptations
- Added pause points for human editing
Reported Outcomes
- High participation Students volunteered ideas actively Peer discussion increased after AI output
- Students revised AI text intentionally Students debated story coherence Some students questioned AI “choices”
“It was surprising and deeply encouraging to see that a student who does not yet read or speak English was still able to learn core AI concepts and perform very well on the assessment quiz. This experience reinforced how AI learning—when designed with visuals, interaction, and hands-on exploration—can be inclusive and accessible beyond language barriers.”
Ethical & Privacy Considerations
- No personal data collected No student names recorded No recordings or images stored
Evidence Type
- Practitioner observation
- Activity documentation
Relevance to Research
- Design-based research Informal learning studies AI-human collaboration framing Early AI literacy conceptualization
- Learning sciences Educational technology AI literacy Informal STEM education
Case Status
- Completed
AAB Classification Tags
Elementary
Afterschool center
Generative Text/Image/Voice
Non-collaborative and collaborative Learning
Low
None
