Back to Cases
Case ReportCompletedAugust 4-7, 2025
AAB-CASE-2025-LL-002

Afterschool Mini AI Summer Camp K-2

Afterschool summer camp (5 days) using a generative AI storytelling application plus AI concept slides with learners ages ~5–7 in Diamond Bar, Southern California. The activity emphasized creative storytelling and early AI awareness, with post-assessment included.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

Afterschool center

02

Learning context

Afterschool center

03

AI role

Co-creator

04

Outcome signal

Not specified

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

Afterschool center

Location

Diamond Bar, Southern California, USA

Primary Facilitator Role

Undergrad. and graduate CS students; technical educators

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • Afterschool center
Session Format

Summer camp

Duration

5 days

Group Size

Around 6

Devices

Individual device

Constraints
  • No individual logins allowed No personal data collection Time-limited setup and teardown Poor Wi‑Fi signal

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

Approx. ages 5–7

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

No prior experience with generative AI tools assumed

Prior Programming Background Assumed

No prior programming background assumed

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Narrative structure (beginning–middle–end) Creative expression
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Awareness of AI as a tool (not a human) Prompt clarity and iteration Reflection on human vs AI contributions
What This Was Not
  • Not a programming lesson Not an AI theory lesson

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

Generative AI storytelling application; AI concept slides

Languages

English

AI Role
  • Co-creator
User Interaction Model
  • Students pick their favorite stuffed animals Educators take a picture of the animal Students provide or pick short prompts using text or voice AI generates story segments Students provide or pick more prompts using text or voice
Safeguards
  • No free-form open chat Content moderation enabled

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Educators introduce storytelling concepts Group brainstorms story themes Students input prompts AI generates draft story text Final story is read aloud
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Human: theme selection, editing, discussion AI: draft generation, storyline suggestions
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Prompt cards with examples Sentence starters Educator-led reflection questions

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • One student cannot read or speak English Some prompts were vague or contradictory Younger students needed help typing prompts One student felt not learned, so he was later added to the age 8-10 group.

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Added pause points for human editing

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • High participation Students volunteered ideas actively Peer discussion increased after AI output
Learning Signals
  • Students revised AI text intentionally Students debated story coherence Some students questioned AI “choices”
Educators Reflection

“It was surprising and deeply encouraging to see that a student who does not yet read or speak English was still able to learn core AI concepts and perform very well on the assessment quiz. This experience reinforced how AI learning—when designed with visuals, interaction, and hands-on exploration—can be inclusive and accessible beyond language barriers.”

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • No personal data collected No student names recorded No recordings or images stored

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Practitioner observation
  • Activity documentation

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Design-based research Informal learning studies AI-human collaboration framing Early AI literacy conceptualization
Relevant Research Domains
  • Learning sciences Educational technology AI literacy Informal STEM education

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

Elementary

Setting

Afterschool center

AI Function

Generative Text/Image/Voice

Pedagogy

Non-collaborative and collaborative Learning

Risk Level

Low

Data Sensitivity

None

Registry Metadata

15
Case ID
AAB-CASE-2025-LL-002
Publication Status
Completed
Tags
caseDiamond Bar, Southern California, USAAfterschool center