Back to Cases
Case ReportPublished empirical study2024
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-094

Does Any AI-Based Activity Contribute to Develop AI Conception? A Case Study with Italian Fifth and Sixth Grade Classes

Artificial Intelligence is undoubtedly becoming pervasive in everyday life of everyone. In this setting, developing correct AI conception since childhood is not only a need to be ad- dressed in educational curricula, but is also a children right.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

02

Learning context

In-school (K-12)

03

AI role

Learning object / concept model

04

Outcome signal

AI literacy

Registry Facets

0
Education Level
  • K-5
  • 6-8
Subject Area
  • K-12
  • elementary/middle school AI conception
  • AI literacy / AI concepts
Use Case Type
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Outreach / informal learning
Stakeholder Group
  • Students
  • Researchers
AI Capability Type
  • AI literacy / AI concepts
Implementation Model
  • In-school (K-12)
Evidence Type
  • Activity documentation
Outcomes Domain
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

Location

United States, Italy

Primary Facilitator Role

Researchers, educators, instructors, or facilitators as described in the source publication

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • In-school (K-12)
Session Format

Course implementation or course design

Duration

one hour

Group Size

one group or the other was made ran- dom. Before the data analyses, we excluded 44 children be- cause of the following reasons: they missed more than 25% of the lessons, they were diagnosed with developmental di; on, they did not have parental consent to participate. The final sample included 192 children (Mean age = 10,98 years; SD = 0.62; 54% female): 110 of the pro- gramming&AI group and 82 children of the programming g; ge = 10,98 years; SD = 0.62; 54% female): 110 of the pro- gramming&AI group and 82 children of the programming group. Implementation We chose the mBlock 5 programming language (Makeblock 20

Devices

AI literacy / AI concepts

Constraints
  • Use with minors requires attention to privacy, consent, data minimization, and adult supervision.

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

K-5, 6-8

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

Mixed or not explicitly specified; infer from target learner group and intervention design.

Prior Programming Background Assumed

Varies by intervention; not specified unless the paper explicitly describes prerequisites.

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Document the AI education intervention, course, tool, or resource described in the source publication.
  • Extract the learner context, AI role, pedagogy, outcomes, and constraints for AAB registry comparison.
  • Artificial Intelligence is undoubtedly becoming pervasive in everyday life of everyone.
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Support AAB comparison across AI literacy, AI education, teacher training, higher education, and workforce contexts.
  • Capture evidence maturity, transferability, and limitations rather than treating the publication as product endorsement.
What This Was Not
  • Not an AAB endorsement of the tool, curriculum, provider, or result.
  • Not a direct replication record unless the source paper reports implementation details sufficient for replication.

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

AI literacy / AI concepts

Languages

Not specified in extracted text

AI Role
  • Learning object / concept model
User Interaction Model
  • Primary interaction pattern inferred from publication: Curriculum / course design, Outreach / informal learning.
  • AI capability focus: AI literacy / AI concepts.
Safeguards
  • Use age-appropriate framing and teacher/facilitator oversight for any classroom deployment.

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Review the publication’s reported context, learner group, AI tool or curriculum, implementation process, and outcome evidence.
  • Map the case to AAB registry fields for comparison across educational levels and AI capability types.
  • Use the source publication and PDF for any manual verification before public registry release.
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Human educators/researchers remain responsible for instructional design, supervision, interpretation, and ethical safeguards.
  • AI systems or AI concepts provide the learning object, support tool, evaluator, simulator, or automation context depending on the paper.
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Scenario / case-based learning
  • Registry extraction emphasizes explicit learning goals, observed outcomes, constraints, and safety limitations.

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • Use with minors requires attention to privacy, consent, data minimization, and adult supervision.

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Case classified under: Published empirical study.
  • Pedagogical pattern: Scenario / case-based learning.
  • Any additional adaptations should be verified against the full paper before public-facing publication.

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • Engagement evidence should be interpreted according to the source paper’s reported method and sample.
  • Accordingly, several initiatives at national and international levels aim at promoting AI and emerging technology literacy, supported also by a proliferation in the literature of learning courses covering a variety of topics, learning objectives and targeted ages.
Learning Signals
  • Accordingly, several initiatives at national and international levels aim at promoting AI and emerging technology literacy, supported also by a proliferation in the literature of learning courses covering a variety of topics, learning objectives and targeted ages.
  • In this paper, we report the results of a case study where we tested the contribution of an AI block-based course in devel- oping computational thinking, and human and AI minds un- derstanding in fifth and sixth grade children.
Educators Reflection

Artificial Intelligence is undoubtedly becoming pervasive in everyday life of everyone. In this setting, developing correct AI conception since childhood is not only a need to be ad- dressed in educational curricula, but is also a children right.

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • Use age-appropriate framing and teacher/facilitator oversight for any classroom deployment.

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Activity documentation

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Can be used as an AAB evidence record for cross-case comparison, standards drafting, and evidence-maturity mapping.
  • Supports identification of recurring patterns in AI literacy, AI education implementation, teacher preparation, assessment, and responsible AI learning.
Relevant Research Domains
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Outreach / informal learning
  • AI literacy / AI concepts

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

K-5, 6-8

Setting

In-school (K-12)

AI Function

AI literacy / AI concepts

Pedagogy

Scenario / case-based learning

Risk Level

Low to Medium

Data Sensitivity

Low to Medium

Source Publication

15
Title

Does Any AI-Based Activity Contribute to Develop AI Conception? A Case Study with Italian Fifth and Sixth Grade Classes

Authors
  • Matteo Baldoni
  • Cristina Baroglio
  • Monica Bucciarelli
  • Sara Capecchi
  • Elena Gandolfi
  • Cristina Gena
  • Francesco Ianì
  • Elisa Marengo
  • Roberto Micalizio
  • Amon Rapp
  • Ivan Nabil Ras
Venue

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38 No. 21, EAAI-24

Year

2024

Doi

10.1609/aaai.v38i21.30350

Source URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/30350

Pdf URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/30350/32390

Pdf Filename

035_Does Any AI-Based Activity Contribute to Develop AI Conception_ A Case Study with Italian Fifth and Sixth Grade Classes.pdf

Page Count

9

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is undoubtedly becoming pervasive in everyday life of everyone. In this setting, developing correct AI conception since childhood is not only a need to be ad- dressed in educational curricula, but is also a children right. Accordingly, several initiatives at national and international levels aim at promoting AI and emerging technology literacy, supported also by a proliferation in the literature of learning courses covering a variety of topics, learning objectives and targeted ages. Schools are therefore pushed to introduce in- novative activities for children in their curricula. In this paper, we report the results of a case study where we tested the contribution of an AI block-based course in devel- oping computational thinking, and human and AI minds un- derstanding in fifth and sixth grade children.

Transferability

16
Best Fit Contexts
  • In-school (K-12)
Likely Failure Modes
  • Use with minors requires attention to privacy, consent, data minimization, and adult supervision.

Cost And Operations

17
Time Cost Notes

Not specified in extracted text unless noted in duration field.

Staffing Notes

Requires educators/researchers/facilitators with sufficient AI literacy and pedagogy knowledge for the target learners.

Infra Notes

Infrastructure depends on AI tool type, learner devices, data access, and institutional policy context.

Extraction Notes

18
Confidence

High

Missing Information
    Reasoning Limits

    This entry was automatically extracted from the PDF text and manifest metadata. Fields should be manually verified before public registry publication, especially group size, location, duration, and outcome claims.

    Duplicate Check Against Uploaded Cases Json
    Closest Existing Title

    Pre-service teachers preparedness for AI-integrated education: An investigation from perceptions, capabilities, and teachers’ identity changes

    Similarity Score

    0.391

    Likely Duplicate

    false

    Registry Metadata

    19
    Case ID
    AAB-CASE-2026-RV-094
    Publication Status
    Published empirical study
    Tags
    caseK-5United States, ItalyIn-school (K-12)AI literacy / AI conceptsK-12elementary/middle school AI conceptionAI literacy / AI conceptsCurriculum / course designOutreach / informal learning