Back to Cases
Case ReportPublished empirical study2025
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-071

Bridging the AI Gap: Evaluating the Impact of an AI Education Program for Caregivers on Parental Leave

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly important across many fields, yet caregivers remain underrepresented in AI-related fields due to a combination of systemic and individual barriers. To address this, the Caregivers and Ma- chine Learning (C&ML) program developed and delivered an accessible AI education program to caregivers on parental leave.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

02

Learning context

Professional / adult learning

03

AI role

Learning object / concept model

04

Outcome signal

AI literacy

Registry Facets

0
Education Level
  • Adult / workforce
Subject Area
  • Adult AI literacy
  • caregiver education
  • ML concepts / supervised learning
Use Case Type
  • Curriculum / course design
Stakeholder Group
  • Adult learners / professionals
  • Researchers
AI Capability Type
  • ML concepts / supervised learning
Implementation Model
  • Professional / adult learning
Evidence Type
  • Survey
  • Qualitative study
Outcomes Domain
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Engagement / motivation

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

Location

Canada

Primary Facilitator Role

Researchers, educators, instructors, or facilitators as described in the source publication

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • Professional / adult learning
Session Format

Classroom, course, or resource-based AI education activity

Duration

Not specified in extracted text

Group Size

all stu- dents who had completed the C&ML program in the 2022 and 2023 cohorts (n=80). The invitation included a letter of information outlining research goals and a link to the elec- tronic survey. No in; all stu- dents who had completed the C&ML program in the 2022 and 2023 cohorts (n=80). The invitation included a letter of information outlining research goals and a link to the elec- tronic survey. No in; facilitate interactive and flexible learning experiences, a small class ratio (5 students:1 teaching assistant (TA)), extended hours support with TAs to accommodate non-traditional working hours, a $500 childc

Devices

ML concepts / supervised learning

Constraints
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

Adult / workforce

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

Mixed or not explicitly specified; infer from target learner group and intervention design.

Prior Programming Background Assumed

Varies by intervention; not specified unless the paper explicitly describes prerequisites.

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Document the AI education intervention, course, tool, or resource described in the source publication.
  • Extract the learner context, AI role, pedagogy, outcomes, and constraints for AAB registry comparison.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly important across many fields, yet caregivers remain underrepresented in AI-related fields due to a combination of systemic and individual barriers.
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Support AAB comparison across AI literacy, AI education, teacher training, higher education, and workforce contexts.
  • Capture evidence maturity, transferability, and limitations rather than treating the publication as product endorsement.
What This Was Not
  • Not an AAB endorsement of the tool, curriculum, provider, or result.
  • Not a direct replication record unless the source paper reports implementation details sufficient for replication.

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

ML concepts / supervised learning

Languages

Not specified in extracted text

AI Role
  • Learning object / concept model
User Interaction Model
  • Primary interaction pattern inferred from publication: Curriculum / course design.
  • AI capability focus: ML concepts / supervised learning.
Safeguards
  • Apply standard AAB safeguards: privacy, transparency, human oversight, and documentation of limitations.

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Review the publication’s reported context, learner group, AI tool or curriculum, implementation process, and outcome evidence.
  • Map the case to AAB registry fields for comparison across educational levels and AI capability types.
  • Use the source publication and PDF for any manual verification before public registry release.
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Human educators/researchers remain responsible for instructional design, supervision, interpretation, and ethical safeguards.
  • AI systems or AI concepts provide the learning object, support tool, evaluator, simulator, or automation context depending on the paper.
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Hands-on / experiential learning
  • Registry extraction emphasizes explicit learning goals, observed outcomes, constraints, and safety limitations.

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Case classified under: Published empirical study.
  • Pedagogical pattern: Hands-on / experiential learning.
  • Any additional adaptations should be verified against the full paper before public-facing publication.

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • Engagement evidence should be interpreted according to the source paper’s reported method and sample.
  • To address this, the Caregivers and Ma- chine Learning (C&ML) program developed and delivered an accessible AI education program to caregivers on parental leave.
Learning Signals
  • To address this, the Caregivers and Ma- chine Learning (C&ML) program developed and delivered an accessible AI education program to caregivers on parental leave.
  • Two cohorts participated in this 6-week interprofes- sional program, featuring fundamental machine learning con- cepts, hands-on programming assignments, and a capstone project.
  • Post-program surveys and semi-structured interviews high- light that caregivers often face barriers such as the rapid pace of AI, discrimination, and balancing caregiving responsibili- ties with learning new skills.
Educators Reflection

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly important across many fields, yet caregivers remain underrepresented in AI-related fields due to a combination of systemic and individual barriers. To address this, the Caregivers and Ma- chine Learning (C&ML) program developed and delivered an accessible AI education program to caregivers on parental leave.

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • Apply standard AAB safeguards: privacy, transparency, human oversight, and documentation of limitations.

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Survey
  • Qualitative study

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Can be used as an AAB evidence record for cross-case comparison, standards drafting, and evidence-maturity mapping.
  • Supports identification of recurring patterns in AI literacy, AI education implementation, teacher preparation, assessment, and responsible AI learning.
Relevant Research Domains
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Engagement / motivation
  • Curriculum / course design
  • ML concepts / supervised learning

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

Adult / workforce

Setting

Professional / adult learning

AI Function

ML concepts / supervised learning

Pedagogy

Hands-on / experiential learning

Risk Level

Low to Medium

Data Sensitivity

Medium

Source Publication

15
Title

Bridging the AI Gap: Evaluating the Impact of an AI Education Program for Caregivers on Parental Leave

Authors
  • Kristina L. Kupferschmidt
  • Flora Wan
  • Juan Carrasquilla Alvarez
  • Dora Gaviria Castaño
  • Graham W. Taylor
  • Sedef Akinli Kocak
Venue

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39 No. 28, EAAI-25

Year

2025

Doi

10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35174

Source URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35174

Pdf URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35174/37329

Pdf Filename

011_Bridging the AI Gap_ Evaluating the Impact of an AI Education Program for Caregivers on Parental Leave.pdf

Page Count

8

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly important across many fields, yet caregivers remain underrepresented in AI-related fields due to a combination of systemic and individual barriers. To address this, the Caregivers and Ma- chine Learning (C&ML) program developed and delivered an accessible AI education program to caregivers on parental leave. Two cohorts participated in this 6-week interprofes- sional program, featuring fundamental machine learning con- cepts, hands-on programming assignments, and a capstone project. This study examines the program’s impact on par- ticipants, focusing on their motivations and barriers before, during, and after the program as outcomes after completion. Post-program surveys and semi-structured interviews high- light that caregivers often face barriers such as the rapid pace of AI, discrimination, and balancing caregiving responsibili- ties with learning new skills. The C&ML program’s flexible structure and personalized support network were critical in enabling participants to fully engage in the program, leading to significant improvements in their knowledge of ML and in- creased confidence in applying these skills. After completing the program, 20% of participants transitioned into AI-related roles or pursued further education. This research highlights the value of targeted, inclusive educational programs for un- derrepresented groups and provides practical recommenda- tions for refining future AI training programs for caregivers.

Transferability

16
Best Fit Contexts
  • Professional / adult learning
Likely Failure Modes
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Cost And Operations

17
Time Cost Notes

Not specified in extracted text unless noted in duration field.

Staffing Notes

Requires educators/researchers/facilitators with sufficient AI literacy and pedagogy knowledge for the target learners.

Infra Notes

Infrastructure depends on AI tool type, learner devices, data access, and institutional policy context.

Extraction Notes

18
Confidence

High

Missing Information
  • duration
Reasoning Limits

This entry was automatically extracted from the PDF text and manifest metadata. Fields should be manually verified before public registry publication, especially group size, location, duration, and outcome claims.

Duplicate Check Against Uploaded Cases Json
Closest Existing Title

Behavioral-pattern exploration and development of an instructional tool for young children to learn AI

Similarity Score

0.441

Likely Duplicate

false

Registry Metadata

19
Case ID
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-071
Publication Status
Published empirical study
Tags
caseAdult / workforceCanadaProfessional / adult learningML concepts / supervised learningAdult AI literacycaregiver educationML concepts / supervised learningCurriculum / course design