Back to Cases
Case ReportPublished curriculum / implementation paper2025
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-070

Human-Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design: Reflections on an Online Course on Human-AI Interaction for Professionals

Human–Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design is an eight-week short online course aimed at professional stu- dents. It is part of an online course platform called Cambridge Advance Online, which is a joint effort between Cambridge University Press & Assessment and the University of Cam- bridge.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

02

Learning context

Higher education

03

AI role

Evaluator

04

Outcome signal

Engagement / motivation

Registry Facets

0
Education Level
  • Higher education
  • Adult / workforce
Subject Area
  • Adult/professional training
  • HAI
  • Assessment / tutoring analytics
Use Case Type
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Learning tool / resource design
  • Assessment support
Stakeholder Group
  • Students
  • Adult learners / professionals
AI Capability Type
  • Assessment / tutoring analytics
Implementation Model
  • Higher education
  • Professional / adult learning
Evidence Type
  • Activity documentation
Outcomes Domain
  • Engagement / motivation
  • Assessment / feedback quality

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

Location

UK, United Kingdom

Primary Facilitator Role

Researchers, educators, instructors, or facilitators as described in the source publication

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • Higher education
  • Professional / adult learning
Session Format

Course implementation or course design

Duration

Not specified in extracted text

Group Size

ly be- came one of the platform’s highest-enrolling courses, attract- ing about 50 students per quarterly course run. To date, more than 200 students have completed the course, and more than 90 percent have rate; es, attract- ing about 50 students per quarterly course run. To date, more than 200 students have completed the course, and more than 90 percent have rated their experience ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. This paper repor; ts. This course launched in July 2023 and has been a success—to date, more than 200 students have completed the course, and more than 90 percent have rated their experience ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. The central idea

Devices

Assessment / tutoring analytics

Constraints
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

Higher education, Adult / workforce

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

Mixed or not explicitly specified; infer from target learner group and intervention design.

Prior Programming Background Assumed

Varies by intervention; not specified unless the paper explicitly describes prerequisites.

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Document the AI education intervention, course, tool, or resource described in the source publication.
  • Extract the learner context, AI role, pedagogy, outcomes, and constraints for AAB registry comparison.
  • Human–Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design is an eight-week short online course aimed at professional stu- dents.
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Support AAB comparison across AI literacy, AI education, teacher training, higher education, and workforce contexts.
  • Capture evidence maturity, transferability, and limitations rather than treating the publication as product endorsement.
What This Was Not
  • Not an AAB endorsement of the tool, curriculum, provider, or result.
  • Not a direct replication record unless the source paper reports implementation details sufficient for replication.

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

Assessment / tutoring analytics

Languages

Not specified in extracted text

AI Role
  • Evaluator
User Interaction Model
  • Primary interaction pattern inferred from publication: Curriculum / course design, Learning tool / resource design, Assessment support.
  • AI capability focus: Assessment / tutoring analytics.
Safeguards
  • Apply standard AAB safeguards: privacy, transparency, human oversight, and documentation of limitations.

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Review the publication’s reported context, learner group, AI tool or curriculum, implementation process, and outcome evidence.
  • Map the case to AAB registry fields for comparison across educational levels and AI capability types.
  • Use the source publication and PDF for any manual verification before public registry release.
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Human educators/researchers remain responsible for instructional design, supervision, interpretation, and ethical safeguards.
  • AI systems or AI concepts provide the learning object, support tool, evaluator, simulator, or automation context depending on the paper.
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Instructional / curriculum-based learning
  • Registry extraction emphasizes explicit learning goals, observed outcomes, constraints, and safety limitations.

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Case classified under: Published curriculum / implementation paper.
  • Pedagogical pattern: Instructional / curriculum-based learning.
  • Any additional adaptations should be verified against the full paper before public-facing publication.

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • Engagement evidence should be interpreted according to the source paper’s reported method and sample.
  • This course launched in July 2023 amidst a massive increase in interest in AI and its applications, and quickly be- came one of the platform’s highest-enrolling courses, attract- ing about 50 students per quarterly course run.
Learning Signals
  • This course launched in July 2023 amidst a massive increase in interest in AI and its applications, and quickly be- came one of the platform’s highest-enrolling courses, attract- ing about 50 students per quarterly course run.
Educators Reflection

Human–Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design is an eight-week short online course aimed at professional stu- dents. It is part of an online course platform called Cambridge Advance Online, which is a joint effort between Cambridge University Press & Assessment and the University of Cam- bridge.

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • Apply standard AAB safeguards: privacy, transparency, human oversight, and documentation of limitations.

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Activity documentation

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Can be used as an AAB evidence record for cross-case comparison, standards drafting, and evidence-maturity mapping.
  • Supports identification of recurring patterns in AI literacy, AI education implementation, teacher preparation, assessment, and responsible AI learning.
Relevant Research Domains
  • Engagement / motivation
  • Assessment / feedback quality
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Learning tool / resource design
  • Assessment support
  • Assessment / tutoring analytics

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

Higher education, Adult / workforce

Setting

Higher education, Professional / adult learning

AI Function

Assessment / tutoring analytics

Pedagogy

Instructional / curriculum-based learning

Risk Level

Low to Medium

Data Sensitivity

Medium

Source Publication

15
Title

Human-Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design: Reflections on an Online Course on Human-AI Interaction for Professionals

Authors
  • Per Ola Kristensson
  • Emily Patterson
Venue

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39 No. 28, EAAI-25

Year

2025

Doi

10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35173

Source URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35173

Pdf URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35173/37328

Pdf Filename

010_Human-Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design_ Reflections on an Online Course on Human-AI Interaction for Professionals.pdf

Page Count

8

Abstract

Human–Computer Interaction for AI Systems Design is an eight-week short online course aimed at professional stu- dents. It is part of an online course platform called Cambridge Advance Online, which is a joint effort between Cambridge University Press & Assessment and the University of Cam- bridge. This course launched in July 2023 amidst a massive increase in interest in AI and its applications, and quickly be- came one of the platform’s highest-enrolling courses, attract- ing about 50 students per quarterly course run. To date, more than 200 students have completed the course, and more than 90 percent have rated their experience ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. This paper reports on our experiences in designing and teach- ing this course.

Transferability

16
Best Fit Contexts
  • Higher education
  • Professional / adult learning
Likely Failure Modes
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Cost And Operations

17
Time Cost Notes

Not specified in extracted text unless noted in duration field.

Staffing Notes

Requires educators/researchers/facilitators with sufficient AI literacy and pedagogy knowledge for the target learners.

Infra Notes

Infrastructure depends on AI tool type, learner devices, data access, and institutional policy context.

Extraction Notes

18
Confidence

High

Missing Information
  • duration
Reasoning Limits

This entry was automatically extracted from the PDF text and manifest metadata. Fields should be manually verified before public registry publication, especially group size, location, duration, and outcome claims.

Duplicate Check Against Uploaded Cases Json
Closest Existing Title

Conceptualizing AI literacies for children and youth: A systematic review on the design of AI literacy educational programs

Similarity Score

0.415

Likely Duplicate

false

Registry Metadata

19
Case ID
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-070
Publication Status
Published curriculum / implementation paper
Tags
caseHigher educationUK, United KingdomHigher educationAssessment / tutoring analyticsAdult/professional trainingHAIAssessment / tutoring analyticsCurriculum / course designLearning tool / resource designAssessment support