Back to Cases
Case ReportPublished empirical study2025
AAB-CASE-2026-RV-067

Computational Thinking with Computer Vision: Developing AI Competency in an Introductory Computer Science Course

Developing competency in artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly crucial for computer science (CS) students at all levels of the CS curriculum. However, most previous research focuses on advanced CS courses, as traditional introductory courses provide limited opportunities to develop AI skills and knowledge.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

02

Learning context

Higher education

03

AI role

Evaluator

04

Outcome signal

AI literacy

Registry Facets

0
Education Level
  • Higher education
Subject Area
  • Higher education
  • AI competency
  • computer vision
  • Computer vision / image classification
  • Ethics / responsible AI
Use Case Type
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Ethics / responsible AI education
Stakeholder Group
  • Students
AI Capability Type
  • Computer vision / image classification
  • Ethics / responsible AI
Implementation Model
  • Higher education
Evidence Type
  • Survey
  • Activity documentation
Outcomes Domain
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Engagement / motivation
  • Ethics and responsible use

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

Source publication / research team or educational organization described in paper

Location

Not specified in extracted text

Primary Facilitator Role

Researchers, educators, instructors, or facilitators as described in the source publication

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • Higher education
Session Format

Course implementation or course design

Duration

29005 Semester Female White Asian Black Hispanic/Latinx Non-CS 1st yr

Group Size

December term) as a 4-credit, 14-week course. Enrollment was capped at 25, and 12 students registered and com- pleted the course. The class met twice a week (Tuesdays and Thursdays) for 75-minute sessions, tota

Devices

Computer vision / image classification, Ethics / responsible AI

Constraints
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

Higher education

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

Mixed or not explicitly specified; infer from target learner group and intervention design.

Prior Programming Background Assumed

Varies by intervention; not specified unless the paper explicitly describes prerequisites.

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Document the AI education intervention, course, tool, or resource described in the source publication.
  • Extract the learner context, AI role, pedagogy, outcomes, and constraints for AAB registry comparison.
  • Developing competency in artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly crucial for computer science (CS) students at all levels of the CS curriculum.
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Support AAB comparison across AI literacy, AI education, teacher training, higher education, and workforce contexts.
  • Capture evidence maturity, transferability, and limitations rather than treating the publication as product endorsement.
What This Was Not
  • Not an AAB endorsement of the tool, curriculum, provider, or result.
  • Not a direct replication record unless the source paper reports implementation details sufficient for replication.

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

Computer vision / image classification, Ethics / responsible AI

Languages

Not specified in extracted text

AI Role
  • Evaluator
User Interaction Model
  • Primary interaction pattern inferred from publication: Curriculum / course design, Ethics / responsible AI education.
  • AI capability focus: Computer vision / image classification, Ethics / responsible AI.
Safeguards
  • Minimize personal data collection and avoid storing identifiable learner media unless approved by local policy/IRB.
  • Include bias, fairness, transparency, and social impact discussion as part of the learning design.

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Review the publication’s reported context, learner group, AI tool or curriculum, implementation process, and outcome evidence.
  • Map the case to AAB registry fields for comparison across educational levels and AI capability types.
  • Use the source publication and PDF for any manual verification before public registry release.
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Human educators/researchers remain responsible for instructional design, supervision, interpretation, and ethical safeguards.
  • AI systems or AI concepts provide the learning object, support tool, evaluator, simulator, or automation context depending on the paper.
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Instructional / curriculum-based learning
  • Registry extraction emphasizes explicit learning goals, observed outcomes, constraints, and safety limitations.

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Case classified under: Published empirical study.
  • Pedagogical pattern: Instructional / curriculum-based learning.
  • Any additional adaptations should be verified against the full paper before public-facing publication.

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • Engagement evidence should be interpreted according to the source paper’s reported method and sample.
  • However, most previous research focuses on advanced CS courses, as traditional introductory courses provide limited opportunities to develop AI skills and knowledge.
Learning Signals
  • However, most previous research focuses on advanced CS courses, as traditional introductory courses provide limited opportunities to develop AI skills and knowledge.
  • This paper introduces an introductory CS course where students learn computational thinking through com- puter vision, a sub-field of AI, as an application context.
  • Through ex- periential activities such as individual projects and reading discussions, our course seeks to balance technical learning and critical thinking goals.
Educators Reflection

Developing competency in artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly crucial for computer science (CS) students at all levels of the CS curriculum. However, most previous research focuses on advanced CS courses, as traditional introductory courses provide limited opportunities to develop AI skills and knowledge.

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • Minimize personal data collection and avoid storing identifiable learner media unless approved by local policy/IRB.
  • Include bias, fairness, transparency, and social impact discussion as part of the learning design.

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Survey
  • Activity documentation

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Can be used as an AAB evidence record for cross-case comparison, standards drafting, and evidence-maturity mapping.
  • Supports identification of recurring patterns in AI literacy, AI education implementation, teacher preparation, assessment, and responsible AI learning.
Relevant Research Domains
  • AI literacy
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Engagement / motivation
  • Ethics and responsible use
  • Curriculum / course design
  • Ethics / responsible AI education
  • Computer vision / image classification
  • Ethics / responsible AI

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

Higher education

Setting

Higher education

AI Function

Computer vision / image classification, Ethics / responsible AI

Pedagogy

Instructional / curriculum-based learning

Risk Level

Medium

Data Sensitivity

Medium

Source Publication

15
Title

Computational Thinking with Computer Vision: Developing AI Competency in an Introductory Computer Science Course

Authors
  • Tahiya Chowdhury
Venue

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39 No. 28, EAAI-25

Year

2025

Doi

10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35170

Source URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35170

Pdf URL

https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/35170/37325

Pdf Filename

007_Computational Thinking with Computer Vision_ Developing AI Competency in an Introductory Computer Science Course.pdf

Page Count

9

Abstract

Developing competency in artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly crucial for computer science (CS) students at all levels of the CS curriculum. However, most previous research focuses on advanced CS courses, as traditional introductory courses provide limited opportunities to develop AI skills and knowledge. This paper introduces an introductory CS course where students learn computational thinking through com- puter vision, a sub-field of AI, as an application context. The course aims to achieve computational thinking outcomes alongside critical thinking outcomes that expose students to AI approaches and their societal implications. Through ex- periential activities such as individual projects and reading discussions, our course seeks to balance technical learning and critical thinking goals. Our evaluation, based on pre-and post-course surveys, shows an improved sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and AI ethics awareness among students. The results suggest that an AI-focused context can enhance partic- ipation and employability, student-selected projects support self-efficacy, and ethically grounded AI instruction can be ef- fective for interdisciplinary audiences. Students’ discussions on reading assignments demonstrated deep engagement with the complex challenges in today’s AI landscape. Finally, we share insights on scaling such courses for larger cohorts and improving the learning experience for introductory CS stu- dents.

Transferability

16
Best Fit Contexts
  • Higher education
Likely Failure Modes
  • The paper provides limited implementation detail in the extracted abstract; additional manual review may be needed for local replication.

Cost And Operations

17
Time Cost Notes

Not specified in extracted text unless noted in duration field.

Staffing Notes

Requires educators/researchers/facilitators with sufficient AI literacy and pedagogy knowledge for the target learners.

Infra Notes

Infrastructure depends on AI tool type, learner devices, data access, and institutional policy context.

Extraction Notes

18
Confidence

High

Missing Information
    Reasoning Limits

    This entry was automatically extracted from the PDF text and manifest metadata. Fields should be manually verified before public registry publication, especially group size, location, duration, and outcome claims.

    Duplicate Check Against Uploaded Cases Json
    Closest Existing Title

    Understanding how Computers Learn: AI Literacy for Elementary School Learners

    Similarity Score

    0.434

    Likely Duplicate

    false

    Registry Metadata

    19
    Case ID
    AAB-CASE-2026-RV-067
    Publication Status
    Published empirical study
    Tags
    caseHigher educationNot specified in extracted textHigher educationComputer vision / image classificationHigher educationAI competencycomputer visionComputer vision / image classificationEthics / responsible AICurriculum / course designEthics / responsible AI education