Back to Cases
Case ReportPublished empirical studyMay 11, 2024
AAB-CASE-2025-RV-016

From Primary Education to Premium Workforce: Drawing on K-12 Approaches for Developing AI Literacy

CHI 2024 paper reporting a trade-union co-designed workshop importing CCI models and tools into adult upskilling, with quantitative knowledge gains and persistent empowerment challenges.

This page documents an AI literacy or AI education case for registry purposes. It is descriptive and does not imply AAB endorsement of any specific tool, provider, or intervention.
01

Implementation

University HCI research team with national trade union partner

02

Learning context

Private program

03

AI role

Co-creator

04

Outcome signal

Knowledge gains

Registry Facets

0
Education Level
  • Adult / workforce
Subject Area
  • AI literacy
  • Human–computer interaction
Use Case Type
  • Professional development
  • Workshop
Stakeholder Group
  • Workers
  • Trade unions
  • Researchers
AI Capability Type
  • ML concepts
  • Critical inquiry
Implementation Model
  • Partnership (university + union)
Evidence Type
  • Pre/post survey
  • Qualitative artifacts
Outcomes Domain
  • Knowledge gains
  • Self-efficacy (unchanged)
  • Empowerment (unchanged)

Implementing Organization

1
Organization Type

University HCI research team with national trade union partner

Location

Denmark

Primary Facilitator Role

Researchers facilitating workshop; union organizing participation

Learning Context

2
Setting Type
  • Private program
Session Format

Full-day facilitated workshop (workplace-oriented AI literacy)

Duration

One intensive day plus three-month follow-up survey

Group Size

53 participants (pre/post materials and follow-up)

Devices

Hands-on ML exploration via ml-machine.org; presentations and group discussions

Constraints
  • Single-country context with high baseline digitalization
  • Short intervention may be insufficient to shift efficacy and empowerment
  • Generalization to other unions or sectors requires further trials
  • Self-report measures may reflect perceived rather than demonstrated competence

Learner Profile

3
Age Range

Adult professionals (union members / workforce cohort)

Prior AI Exposure Assumed

Mixed prior workplace exposure to ML applications

Prior Programming Background Assumed

Not required; workshop uses accessible ML authoring and discussion scaffolds

Educational Intent

4
Primary Learning Goals
  • Increase understanding of core ML ideas relevant to workplace technologies
  • Practice critically analyzing proposed ML systems using DORIT-style questioning
  • Connect CCI-derived pedagogies to adult upskilling contexts
Secondary Learning Goals
  • Stimulate peer discussion about ML potentials and harms in participants' work settings
  • Seed ambassadorship and union-mediated communities of practice
What This Was Not
  • Not a randomized multi-site trial
  • Not a programming-intensive deep ML course
  • Not primarily about generative LLM workplace policies

AI Tool Description

5
Tool Type

ml-machine.org ML authoring / exploration tool plus facilitated critique models

AI Role
  • Co-creator
  • Evaluator
Languages

Danish professional context (materials likely Danish/English mix per venue)

User Interaction Model
  • Short inputs introducing ML fundamentals
  • Embodied and discussion-based group work using CEML and DORIT
  • Participants produce workplace ML system concepts and analyses
Safeguards
  • Critical examination of bias, accountability, and fairness in workplace ML scenarios
  • Consent for non-anonymized appearance in publication (as stated in paper)
  • Avoid overpromising empowerment from one-day events without infrastructural follow-up

Activity Design

6
Activity Flow
  • Greetings and framing of workplace AI/ML stakes
  • CEML-grounded ML fundamentals and ml-machine.org hands-on block
  • DORIT-guided critique of technological systems
  • Group discussions on ML potentials and challenges; synthesis
Human Vs AI Responsibilities
  • Participants retain judgment on workplace adoption; tools illustrate mechanisms
  • Facilitators steer epistemic quality and connect examples to union concerns
Scaffolding Strategies
  • Import K-12-tested models (CEML, DORIT) to lower intimidation for adults
  • Use tangible artifacts and structured vocabularies to externalize values and risks

Observed Challenges

7
Educators Reported
  • Knowledge increased while self-efficacy and empowerment scales did not
  • Suggests long-horizon support, communities, and ambassadorship beyond one-shot training
  • Adults outside formal education lack scaffolding ecosystems available to K-12 CCI projects

Design Adaptations

8
Adaptations
  • Recontextualized CCI methods from classrooms to union-organized professional development
  • Combined survey battery inspired by computing education research with qualitative artifact coding

Reported Outcomes

9
Engagement
  • Participants produced substantive workshop artifacts (ML system ideas and analyses)
  • Follow-up survey captured persistence of perceptions three months later
Learning Signals
  • Statistically significant improvement in self-reported ML knowledge pre to post
  • No significant improvement in self-efficacy or empowerment—aligned with prior CCI empowerment measurement challenges
Educators Reflection

Authors argue HCI should invest in participatory infrastructuring with unions and AI literacy ambassadors to sustain empowerment beyond initial knowledge gains.

Ethical & Privacy Considerations

10
Privacy
  • Workplace ML examples may involve sensitive operational data; anonymize scenarios in facilitation
  • Survey data require GDPR-aligned handling and clear union–research data agreements
  • Non-anonymized consent for photos or quotes must be freely given and documented
  • Discuss algorithmic discrimination using realistic but non-stigmatizing cases

Evidence Type

11
Evidence
  • Post assessment
  • Activity documentation
  • Practitioner observation

Relevance to Research

12
Potential Research Use
  • Longitudinal designs pairing workshops with ambassador networks and microcredentials
  • Objective knowledge checks complementing self-report surveys in adult AI literacy
Relevant Research Domains
  • Workplace AI literacy
  • Participatory design with labor organizations
  • CCI methods transfer to adult learning

Case Status

13
Case Status
  • Completed

AAB Classification Tags

14
Age

Adults

Setting

Union-organized professional learning

AI Function

ML literacy + critical sociotechnical analysis

Pedagogy

Workshop (CCI-adapted)

Risk Level

Medium

Data Sensitivity

Medium (workplace examples, surveys)

Registry Metadata

15
Case ID
AAB-CASE-2025-RV-016
Publication Status
Published empirical study
Tags
caseAdult / workforceDenmarkPartnership (university + union)ML conceptsAI literacyHuman–computer interactionProfessional developmentWorkshop