From Primary Education to Premium Workforce: Drawing on K-12 Approaches for Developing AI Literacy
CHI 2024 paper reporting a trade-union co-designed workshop importing CCI models and tools into adult upskilling, with quantitative knowledge gains and persistent empowerment challenges.
Implementation
University HCI research team with national trade union partner
Learning context
Private program
AI role
Co-creator
Outcome signal
Knowledge gains
Registry Facets
- Adult / workforce
- AI literacy
- Human–computer interaction
- Professional development
- Workshop
- Workers
- Trade unions
- Researchers
- ML concepts
- Critical inquiry
- Partnership (university + union)
- Pre/post survey
- Qualitative artifacts
- Knowledge gains
- Self-efficacy (unchanged)
- Empowerment (unchanged)
Implementing Organization
University HCI research team with national trade union partner
Denmark
Researchers facilitating workshop; union organizing participation
Learning Context
- Private program
Full-day facilitated workshop (workplace-oriented AI literacy)
One intensive day plus three-month follow-up survey
53 participants (pre/post materials and follow-up)
Hands-on ML exploration via ml-machine.org; presentations and group discussions
- Single-country context with high baseline digitalization
- Short intervention may be insufficient to shift efficacy and empowerment
- Generalization to other unions or sectors requires further trials
- Self-report measures may reflect perceived rather than demonstrated competence
Learner Profile
Adult professionals (union members / workforce cohort)
Mixed prior workplace exposure to ML applications
Not required; workshop uses accessible ML authoring and discussion scaffolds
Educational Intent
- Increase understanding of core ML ideas relevant to workplace technologies
- Practice critically analyzing proposed ML systems using DORIT-style questioning
- Connect CCI-derived pedagogies to adult upskilling contexts
- Stimulate peer discussion about ML potentials and harms in participants' work settings
- Seed ambassadorship and union-mediated communities of practice
- Not a randomized multi-site trial
- Not a programming-intensive deep ML course
- Not primarily about generative LLM workplace policies
AI Tool Description
ml-machine.org ML authoring / exploration tool plus facilitated critique models
- Co-creator
- Evaluator
Danish professional context (materials likely Danish/English mix per venue)
- Short inputs introducing ML fundamentals
- Embodied and discussion-based group work using CEML and DORIT
- Participants produce workplace ML system concepts and analyses
- Critical examination of bias, accountability, and fairness in workplace ML scenarios
- Consent for non-anonymized appearance in publication (as stated in paper)
- Avoid overpromising empowerment from one-day events without infrastructural follow-up
Activity Design
- Greetings and framing of workplace AI/ML stakes
- CEML-grounded ML fundamentals and ml-machine.org hands-on block
- DORIT-guided critique of technological systems
- Group discussions on ML potentials and challenges; synthesis
- Participants retain judgment on workplace adoption; tools illustrate mechanisms
- Facilitators steer epistemic quality and connect examples to union concerns
- Import K-12-tested models (CEML, DORIT) to lower intimidation for adults
- Use tangible artifacts and structured vocabularies to externalize values and risks
Observed Challenges
- Knowledge increased while self-efficacy and empowerment scales did not
- Suggests long-horizon support, communities, and ambassadorship beyond one-shot training
- Adults outside formal education lack scaffolding ecosystems available to K-12 CCI projects
Design Adaptations
- Recontextualized CCI methods from classrooms to union-organized professional development
- Combined survey battery inspired by computing education research with qualitative artifact coding
Reported Outcomes
- Participants produced substantive workshop artifacts (ML system ideas and analyses)
- Follow-up survey captured persistence of perceptions three months later
- Statistically significant improvement in self-reported ML knowledge pre to post
- No significant improvement in self-efficacy or empowerment—aligned with prior CCI empowerment measurement challenges
Authors argue HCI should invest in participatory infrastructuring with unions and AI literacy ambassadors to sustain empowerment beyond initial knowledge gains.
Ethical & Privacy Considerations
- Workplace ML examples may involve sensitive operational data; anonymize scenarios in facilitation
- Survey data require GDPR-aligned handling and clear union–research data agreements
- Non-anonymized consent for photos or quotes must be freely given and documented
- Discuss algorithmic discrimination using realistic but non-stigmatizing cases
Evidence Type
- Post assessment
- Activity documentation
- Practitioner observation
Relevance to Research
- Longitudinal designs pairing workshops with ambassador networks and microcredentials
- Objective knowledge checks complementing self-report surveys in adult AI literacy
- Workplace AI literacy
- Participatory design with labor organizations
- CCI methods transfer to adult learning
Case Status
- Completed
AAB Classification Tags
Adults
Union-organized professional learning
ML literacy + critical sociotechnical analysis
Workshop (CCI-adapted)
Medium
Medium (workplace examples, surveys)
